Does the Supreme Court's Current Doctrine of Stare Decisis Require Adherence to the Supreme Court's Current Doctrine of Stare Decisis

Does the Supreme Court's Current Doctrine of Stare Decisis Require Adherence to the Supreme Court's Current Doctrine of Stare Decisis

Auteur : Michael Stokes Paulsen

Date de publication : 2008

Éditeur : SSRN

Nombre de pages : 49

Résumé du livre

This Article asks whether a fair application of the Supreme Court's current doctrine of stare decisis to the Supreme Court's current doctrine of stare decisis would counsel in favor of adhering to current doctrine or departing from it. Professor Paulsen argues that the paradoxical answer is that current doctrine of precedent suggests that current doctrine of precedent disserves all of the doctrine's supposed policy justifications. Accordingly, the Court's current doctrine of stare decisis may and should be overruled - according to the Court's current doctrine of stare decisis.

Connexion / Inscription

Saisissez votre e-mail pour vous connecter ou créer un compte

Connexion

Inscription

Mot de passe oublié ?

Nous allons vous envoyer un message pour vous permettre de vous connecter.